Skip to main content
Speak with a Strategist 865-217-6753
Platforms / Next.js / Supabase
Next.js & Supabase

When You Need an App, Not a Website.

Logins. Customer-specific data. Workflows that a form and a spreadsheet cannot hold. The moment your business crosses that line, most web agencies hand you off to somebody else. I build on both sides of it: marketing sites on Astro, applications on Next.js and Supabase, one partner accountable for both.

The Work

What I Actually Build When a Site Is Not Enough

Client portals and dashboards

The moment your customers need to log in and see their own data, you have left website territory. I build the portal: auth, per-user views, and the reporting behind it, wired to the systems you already run.

Auth and user data on Supabase

Supabase gives you a real Postgres database, authentication, and row-level security without inventing a backend from scratch. Your data stays queryable, portable, and yours, not locked in a SaaS tool that almost fits.

Next.js application architecture

For interfaces that are genuinely interactive, dashboards, multi-step workflows, internal tools, Next.js is the right tool. I use it where an application is the honest requirement, not as a default for pages that should be plain HTML.

Deciding which side of the line you are on

Half the value is the call itself: what belongs in the app, and what stays on the fast Astro marketing site. One partner across both means nothing gets built on the wrong side, and the two stay wired together.

My Take: The Expensive Mistake Is Building One With the Other's Tools

Businesses get sold apps when they need websites, and websites when they need apps. Both errors are expensive in the same way: an app built from website tools becomes plugin duct tape that breaks under real users, and a marketing site built like an app is slow for no reason. The fix is drawing the line deliberately. Your marketing site stays a fast hand-coded Astro build, and the application gets a real database and real auth instead of five SaaS subscriptions that almost fit.

Read the full argument: website vs web app →
The Evidence

What I'm Building Right Now

The client reporting dashboard, in pilot

The worked example is the application I am building for my own clients: a reporting dashboard on exactly this stack, Next.js on the front, Supabase holding the data, where clients log in and see their leads, sources, and spend in one place instead of a monthly PDF.

Honest framing: it is in pilot with active clients today, not a polished product with a testimonial page. I am telling you about it because it is current proof that I ship on this stack, and I will publish it properly when it has earned a case study.

How the Work Gets Measured

Reported Against Pipeline, Not Activity

Everything I run is tracked and reported against the numbers your leadership team already cares about: qualified pipeline, cost per opportunity, closed-won revenue. You get a live dashboard plus a reporting cadence we set up front, so you see what was done, what it moved, and what it cost. And when a channel can't earn its budget, I say so.

Not sure if you need a site or an app? That's the call to book.

Just need the marketing site done right? See how I build on Astro →